Haiti vs Zimbabwe: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Haiti
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Haiti rank
140th
Zimbabwe rank
137th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time
- Haiti
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Haiti, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Haiti's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Haiti ahead.
Haiti ranks 140th and Zimbabwe ranks 137th of 176 countries.
Haiti has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Haiti |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Haiti |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Haiti or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Haiti as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Haiti and Zimbabwe?
- 0 hectares per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Haiti and Zimbabwe rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?
- Haiti ranks 140th and Zimbabwe ranks 137th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.