Guinea-Bissau vs Uruguay: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Guinea-Bissau
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Uruguay
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau rank
66th
Uruguay rank
68th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Uruguay
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Uruguay, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 66th and Uruguay ranks 68th of 176 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Guinea-Bissau or Uruguay?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Guinea-Bissau and Uruguay?
- 0 hectares per person, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Uruguay?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Uruguay rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 66th and Uruguay ranks 68th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.