What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Guinea-Bissau and Nepal?

0 hectares per person, with Nepal ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Nepal?

24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Guinea-Bissau vs Nepal: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita

Guinea-Bissau

0 hectares per person

in 2024

Nepal

0 hectares per person

in 2024

Guinea-Bissau rank

66th

Nepal rank

64th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time

Guinea-Bissau
Nepal

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0 hectares per person.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 66th and Nepal ranks 64th of 176 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Guinea-Bissau	Nepal	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	Guinea-Bissau
2010s	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	Guinea-Bissau
2020s	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Guinea-Bissau or Nepal?: Nepal, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Guinea-Bissau as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Guinea-Bissau and Nepal?: 0 hectares per person, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Nepal?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Nepal rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?: Guinea-Bissau ranks 66th and Nepal ranks 64th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Nepal: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-capita/guinea-bissau/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-capita/guinea-bissau/nepal/">Guinea-Bissau vs Nepal: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Unit: hectares per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,995 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.