Georgia vs Tanzania: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Georgia
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Tanzania
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Georgia rank
91st
Tanzania rank
94th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time
- Georgia
- Tanzania
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Tanzania, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Tanzania ahead.
Georgia ranks 91st and Tanzania ranks 94th of 176 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Tanzania |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Georgia or Tanzania?
- Georgia, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Tanzania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Georgia and Tanzania?
- 0 hectares per person, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Tanzania?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Tanzania rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?
- Georgia ranks 91st and Tanzania ranks 94th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.