Gambia vs Libya: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Gambia
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Libya
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Gambia rank
156th
Libya rank
159th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time
- Gambia
- Libya
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Libya, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
That makes Gambia's figure about 1.2 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Libya ahead.
Gambia ranks 156th and Libya ranks 159th of 176 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Gambia |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Gambia |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Gambia or Libya?
- Gambia, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Gambia and Libya?
- 0 hectares per person, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Libya?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Gambia and Libya rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?
- Gambia ranks 156th and Libya ranks 159th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.