Eswatini vs Russia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Eswatini
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Russia
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Eswatini rank
50th
Russia rank
49th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time
- Eswatini
- Russia
How they compare
Russia currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 50th and Russia ranks 49th of 176 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Russia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Eswatini or Russia?
- Russia, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Eswatini and Russia?
- 0 hectares per person, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Russia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Russia rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?
- Eswatini ranks 50th and Russia ranks 49th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.