Ecuador vs Serbia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Ecuador
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Serbia
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Ecuador rank
81st
Serbia rank
80th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time
- Ecuador
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Ecuador, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 81st and Serbia ranks 80th of 176 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Ecuador or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Ecuador and Serbia?
- 0 hectares per person, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Serbia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Serbia rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?
- Ecuador ranks 81st and Serbia ranks 80th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.