Ecuador vs Mexico: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Ecuador
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Mexico
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Ecuador rank
81st
Mexico rank
78th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time
- Ecuador
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Ecuador, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Mexico ahead.
Ecuador ranks 81st and Mexico ranks 78th of 176 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Mexico |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Mexico |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Ecuador or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Ecuador and Mexico?
- 0 hectares per person, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mexico?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Mexico rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?
- Ecuador ranks 81st and Mexico ranks 78th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.