What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Curacao and Sri Lanka?

0 hectares per person, with Curacao ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Sri Lanka?

19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Curacao vs Sri Lanka: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita

Curacao

0 hectares per person

in 2024

Sri Lanka

0 hectares per person

in 2024

Curacao rank

101st

Sri Lanka rank

103rd

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time

Curacao
Sri Lanka

How they compare

Curacao currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 hectares per person.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Curacao ranks 101st and Sri Lanka ranks 103rd of 176 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Curacao averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Curacao	Sri Lanka	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	Sri Lanka
2010s	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	Sri Lanka
2020s	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	Curacao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Curacao or Sri Lanka?: Curacao, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Curacao and Sri Lanka?: 0 hectares per person, with Curacao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Sri Lanka?: 19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Curacao and Sri Lanka rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?: Curacao ranks 101st and Sri Lanka ranks 103rd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Curacao vs Sri Lanka: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-capita/curacao/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-capita/curacao/sri-lanka/">Curacao vs Sri Lanka: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Unit: hectares per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,995 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.