Curacao vs Peru: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Curacao
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Peru
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Curacao rank
101st
Peru rank
102nd
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time
- Curacao
- Peru
How they compare
Curacao currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Peru, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Peru ahead.
Curacao ranks 101st and Peru ranks 102nd of 176 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Curacao averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curacao | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Peru |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Peru |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Curacao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Curacao or Peru?
- Curacao, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Peru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Curacao and Peru?
- 0 hectares per person, with Curacao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Peru?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Curacao and Peru rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?
- Curacao ranks 101st and Peru ranks 102nd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.