Cuba vs Togo: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Cuba
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Togo
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Cuba rank
138th
Togo rank
139th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time
- Cuba
- Togo
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Togo, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Togo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Togo ahead.
Cuba ranks 138th and Togo ranks 139th of 176 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Cuba or Togo?
- Cuba, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Togo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Cuba and Togo?
- 0 hectares per person, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Togo?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Togo rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?
- Cuba ranks 138th and Togo ranks 139th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.