Cuba vs Haiti: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Cuba
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Haiti
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Cuba rank
138th
Haiti rank
140th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time
- Cuba
- Haiti
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Haiti, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Haiti's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 138th and Haiti ranks 140th of 176 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Haiti in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Haiti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Haiti |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Cuba or Haiti?
- Cuba, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Haiti as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Cuba and Haiti?
- 0 hectares per person, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Haiti?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Haiti rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?
- Cuba ranks 138th and Haiti ranks 140th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.