Costa Rica vs Japan: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Costa Rica
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Japan
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
76th
Japan rank
77th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time
- Costa Rica
- Japan
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Japan, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 76th and Japan ranks 77th of 176 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0001 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0.0001 hectares per person | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Costa Rica or Japan?
- Costa Rica, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Japan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Costa Rica and Japan?
- 0 hectares per person, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Japan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Japan rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?
- Costa Rica ranks 76th and Japan ranks 77th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.