China vs Guatemala: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
China
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Guatemala
0 hectares per person
in 2024
China rank
56th
Guatemala rank
58th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time
- China
- Guatemala
How they compare
China currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Guatemala, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Guatemala ahead.
China ranks 56th and Guatemala ranks 58th of 176 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per person | 0.0001 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, China or Guatemala?
- China, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Guatemala as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between China and Guatemala?
- 0 hectares per person, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Guatemala?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do China and Guatemala rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?
- China ranks 56th and Guatemala ranks 58th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.