What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Chile and Mauritius?

0 hectares per person, with Mauritius ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mauritius?

14 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2014.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Mauritius: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita

Chile

0 hectares per person

in 2024

Mauritius

0 hectares per person

in 2014

Chile rank

93rd

Mauritius rank

90th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time

Chile
Mauritius

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Chile, a difference of 0 hectares per person.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 93rd and Mauritius ranks 90th of 176 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Mauritius	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	Chile
2010s	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Chile or Mauritius?: Mauritius, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Chile as of 2014.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Chile and Mauritius?: 0 hectares per person, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mauritius?: 14 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2014.
How do Chile and Mauritius rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?: Chile ranks 93rd and Mauritius ranks 90th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Mauritius: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-capita/chile/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-capita/chile/mauritius/">Chile vs Mauritius: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Unit: hectares per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,995 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.