Chile vs Georgia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Chile
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Georgia
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Chile rank
93rd
Georgia rank
91st
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time
- Chile
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Chile, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 93rd and Georgia ranks 91st of 176 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Chile |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Chile |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Chile or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Chile and Georgia?
- 0 hectares per person, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Georgia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Georgia rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?
- Chile ranks 93rd and Georgia ranks 91st of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.