Chile vs Fiji: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Chile
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Fiji
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Chile rank
93rd
Fiji rank
96th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time
- Chile
- Fiji
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Fiji, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 93rd and Fiji ranks 96th of 176 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Fiji in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Chile |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Fiji |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Chile or Fiji?
- Chile, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Fiji as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Chile and Fiji?
- 0 hectares per person, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Fiji?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Fiji rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?
- Chile ranks 93rd and Fiji ranks 96th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.