Brazil vs Eswatini: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Brazil
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Eswatini
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Brazil rank
53rd
Eswatini rank
50th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time
- Brazil
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Brazil, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 53rd and Eswatini ranks 50th of 176 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Brazil |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Brazil |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Brazil or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Brazil as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Brazil and Eswatini?
- 0 hectares per person, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Eswatini?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Eswatini rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?
- Brazil ranks 53rd and Eswatini ranks 50th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.