Botswana vs Iran: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Botswana
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Iran
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Botswana rank
172nd
Iran rank
170th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time
- Botswana
- Iran
How they compare
Iran currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Botswana, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 172nd and Iran ranks 170th of 176 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Iran in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Iran | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Botswana |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Iran |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Botswana or Iran?
- Iran, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Botswana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Botswana and Iran?
- 0 hectares per person, with Iran ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Iran?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Botswana and Iran rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?
- Botswana ranks 172nd and Iran ranks 170th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.