What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Bolivia and New Zealand?

0 hectares per person, with Bolivia ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and New Zealand?

24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bolivia vs New Zealand: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita

Bolivia

0 hectares per person

in 2024

New Zealand

0 hectares per person

in 2024

Bolivia rank

69th

New Zealand rank

71st

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time

Bolivia
New Zealand

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in New Zealand, a difference of 0 hectares per person.

That makes Bolivia's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Bolivia ahead.

Bolivia ranks 69th and New Zealand ranks 71st of 176 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bolivia	New Zealand	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0001 hectares per person	0.0001 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	New Zealand
2010s	0.0001 hectares per person	0.0001 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	Bolivia
2020s	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Bolivia or New Zealand?: Bolivia, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Bolivia and New Zealand?: 0 hectares per person, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and New Zealand?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Bolivia and New Zealand rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?: Bolivia ranks 69th and New Zealand ranks 71st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs New Zealand: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-capita/bolivia/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-capita/bolivia/new-zealand/">Bolivia vs New Zealand: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Unit: hectares per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,995 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.