Belgium vs Ecuador: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Belgium
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Ecuador
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Belgium rank
82nd
Ecuador rank
81st
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time
- Belgium
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Belgium, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Ecuador ahead.
Belgium ranks 82nd and Ecuador ranks 81st of 176 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Belgium or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Belgium as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Belgium and Ecuador?
- 0 hectares per person, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Ecuador?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Ecuador rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?
- Belgium ranks 82nd and Ecuador ranks 81st of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.