Bangladesh vs Egypt: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Bangladesh
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Egypt
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
163rd
Egypt rank
165th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time
- Bangladesh
- Egypt
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Egypt, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.7 times Egypt's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 163rd and Egypt ranks 165th of 176 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Egypt | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Bangladesh or Egypt?
- Bangladesh, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Egypt as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Bangladesh and Egypt?
- 0 hectares per person, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Egypt?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Egypt rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?
- Bangladesh ranks 163rd and Egypt ranks 165th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.