What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Austria and Congo?

0 hectares per person, with Congo ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Congo?

24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Austria vs Congo: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita

Austria

0 hectares per person

in 2024

Congo

0 hectares per person

in 2024

Austria rank

46th

Congo rank

45th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time

Austria
Congo

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Austria, a difference of 0 hectares per person.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Austria's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Austria ranks 46th and Congo ranks 45th of 176 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Austria	Congo	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 hectares per person	0.0001 hectares per person	0.0001 hectares per person	Congo
2010s	0 hectares per person	0.0001 hectares per person	0.0001 hectares per person	Congo
2020s	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Austria or Congo?: Congo, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Austria as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Austria and Congo?: 0 hectares per person, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Congo?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Austria and Congo rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?: Austria ranks 46th and Congo ranks 45th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Congo: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-capita/austria/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-capita/austria/congo-rep/">Austria vs Congo: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Unit: hectares per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,995 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.