Angola vs Luxembourg: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Angola
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Luxembourg
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Angola rank
104th
Luxembourg rank
105th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time
- Angola
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Angola currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Luxembourg, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 104th and Luxembourg ranks 105th of 176 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Angola |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Angola |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Angola or Luxembourg?
- Angola, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Angola and Luxembourg?
- 0 hectares per person, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Angola and Luxembourg rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?
- Angola ranks 104th and Luxembourg ranks 105th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.