Uzbekistan vs Palestine: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Uzbekistan
0.3493 hectares
in 2024
Palestine
0.3286 hectares
in 2024
Uzbekistan rank
168th
Palestine rank
169th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Uzbekistan
- Palestine
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 0.3493 hectares against 0.3286 hectares in Palestine, a difference of 0.0207 hectares.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times Palestine's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Uzbekistan ranks 168th and Palestine ranks 169th of 186 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uzbekistan | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.61 hectares | 0.5167 hectares | 7.09 hectares | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 1.76 hectares | 0.5438 hectares | 1.22 hectares | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 0.3139 hectares | 0.1965 hectares | 0.1174 hectares | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Uzbekistan or Palestine?
- Uzbekistan, at 0.3493 hectares against 0.3286 hectares in Palestine as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Uzbekistan and Palestine?
- 0.0207 hectares, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uzbekistan and Palestine?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Uzbekistan and Palestine rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Uzbekistan ranks 168th and Palestine ranks 169th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.