Tajikistan vs Uzbekistan: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Tajikistan
0.2997 hectares
in 2014
Uzbekistan
0.3493 hectares
in 2024
Tajikistan rank
171st
Uzbekistan rank
168th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Tajikistan
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 0.3493 hectares against 0.2997 hectares in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.0496 hectares.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.2 times Tajikistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Tajikistan ranks 171st and Uzbekistan ranks 168th of 186 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tajikistan | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.26 hectares | 7.61 hectares | 6.34 hectares | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 0.1432 hectares | 2.63 hectares | 2.48 hectares | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Tajikistan or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 0.3493 hectares against 0.2997 hectares in Tajikistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Tajikistan and Uzbekistan?
- 0.0496 hectares, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tajikistan and Uzbekistan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2014.
- How do Tajikistan and Uzbekistan rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Tajikistan ranks 171st and Uzbekistan ranks 168th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.