Saint Lucia vs Tunisia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Saint Lucia
7.85 hectares
in 2024
Tunisia
8.84 hectares
in 2024
Saint Lucia rank
137th
Tunisia rank
134th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Saint Lucia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 8.84 hectares against 7.85 hectares in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.99 hectares.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Saint Lucia's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Saint Lucia ranks 137th and Tunisia ranks 134th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Saint Lucia averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Lucia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.65 hectares | 31.63 hectares | 11.98 hectares | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 14.09 hectares | 13.69 hectares | 0.404 hectares | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 10.4 hectares | 7.41 hectares | 3 hectares | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Saint Lucia or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 8.84 hectares against 7.85 hectares in Saint Lucia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Saint Lucia and Tunisia?
- 0.99 hectares, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and Tunisia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Saint Lucia and Tunisia rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Saint Lucia ranks 137th and Tunisia ranks 134th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.