Singapore vs Solomon Islands: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Singapore
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 54.84 hectares against 51.03 hectares in Solomon Islands, a difference of 3.81 hectares.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Solomon Islands's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Singapore ranks 100th and Solomon Islands ranks 101st of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Singapore averaged higher in 2 and Solomon Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.09 hectares | 71.95 hectares | 23.86 hectares | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 128.56 hectares | 105.05 hectares | 23.5 hectares | Singapore |
| 2020s | 93.69 hectares | 55.64 hectares | 38.06 hectares | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Singapore or Solomon Islands?
- Singapore, at 54.84 hectares against 51.03 hectares in Solomon Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Singapore and Solomon Islands?
- 3.81 hectares, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Solomon Islands?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Singapore and Solomon Islands rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Singapore ranks 100th and Solomon Islands ranks 101st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.