What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Reunion and Palestine?

0.0407 hectares, with Palestine ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Reunion and Palestine?

16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Reunion vs Palestine: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled

Reunion

0.2879 hectares

in 2016

Palestine

0.3286 hectares

in 2024

Reunion rank

172nd

Palestine rank

169th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time

Reunion
Palestine

How they compare

Palestine currently reports 0.3286 hectares against 0.2879 hectares in Reunion, a difference of 0.0407 hectares.

That makes Palestine's figure about 1.1 times Reunion's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Reunion ahead.

Reunion ranks 172nd and Palestine ranks 169th of 186 countries.

Reunion has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Reunion	Palestine	Difference	Ahead
2000s	4.48 hectares	0.5167 hectares	3.96 hectares	Reunion
2010s	13.46 hectares	0.4776 hectares	12.98 hectares	Reunion

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Reunion or Palestine?: Palestine, at 0.3286 hectares against 0.2879 hectares in Reunion as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Reunion and Palestine?: 0.0407 hectares, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Reunion and Palestine?: 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
How do Reunion and Palestine rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?: Reunion ranks 172nd and Palestine ranks 169th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Reunion vs Palestine: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/reunion/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/reunion/west-bank-and-gaza/">Reunion vs Palestine: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Unit: hectares
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 186 places, 4,306 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.