North Macedonia vs Pakistan: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- North Macedonia
- Pakistan
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 19.38 hectares against 17.51 hectares in Pakistan, a difference of 1.87 hectares.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was North Macedonia ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 121st and Pakistan ranks 124th of 186 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.39 hectares | 10.15 hectares | 13.23 hectares | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 25.28 hectares | 5.5 hectares | 19.78 hectares | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 23.08 hectares | 9.29 hectares | 13.79 hectares | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, North Macedonia or Pakistan?
- North Macedonia, at 19.38 hectares against 17.51 hectares in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between North Macedonia and Pakistan?
- 1.87 hectares, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Pakistan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do North Macedonia and Pakistan rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- North Macedonia ranks 121st and Pakistan ranks 124th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.