Nicaragua vs South Sudan: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Nicaragua
24.77 hectares
in 2024
South Sudan
25.73 hectares
in 2024
Nicaragua rank
118th
South Sudan rank
117th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Nicaragua
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 25.73 hectares against 24.77 hectares in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.96 hectares.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was South Sudan ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 118th and South Sudan ranks 117th of 186 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.8 hectares | 421.77 hectares | 362.97 hectares | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 42.69 hectares | 139.51 hectares | 96.83 hectares | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 21.86 hectares | 24.62 hectares | 2.76 hectares | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Nicaragua or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 25.73 hectares against 24.77 hectares in Nicaragua as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Nicaragua and South Sudan?
- 0.96 hectares, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and South Sudan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Nicaragua and South Sudan rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Nicaragua ranks 118th and South Sudan ranks 117th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.