Nicaragua vs North Macedonia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Nicaragua
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 24.77 hectares against 19.38 hectares in North Macedonia, a difference of 5.39 hectares.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.3 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 118th and North Macedonia ranks 121st of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.8 hectares | 23.39 hectares | 35.41 hectares | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 42.69 hectares | 25.28 hectares | 17.41 hectares | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 21.86 hectares | 23.08 hectares | 1.22 hectares | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Nicaragua or North Macedonia?
- Nicaragua, at 24.77 hectares against 19.38 hectares in North Macedonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Nicaragua and North Macedonia?
- 5.39 hectares, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and North Macedonia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Nicaragua and North Macedonia rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Nicaragua ranks 118th and North Macedonia ranks 121st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.