What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Nepal and Uganda?

37.74 hectares, with Uganda ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Uganda?

24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Nepal vs Uganda: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled

Nepal

647.14 hectares

in 2024

Uganda

684.88 hectares

in 2024

Nepal rank

31st

Uganda rank

29th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time

Nepal
Uganda

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 684.88 hectares against 647.14 hectares in Nepal, a difference of 37.74 hectares.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Uganda ahead.

Nepal ranks 31st and Uganda ranks 29th of 186 countries.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Nepal	Uganda	Difference	Ahead
2000s	181.48 hectares	281.75 hectares	100.27 hectares	Uganda
2010s	296.05 hectares	621.23 hectares	325.18 hectares	Uganda
2020s	619.07 hectares	663.52 hectares	44.45 hectares	Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Nepal or Uganda?: Uganda, at 684.88 hectares against 647.14 hectares in Nepal as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Nepal and Uganda?: 37.74 hectares, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Uganda?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Nepal and Uganda rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?: Nepal ranks 31st and Uganda ranks 29th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Uganda: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/nepal/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/nepal/uganda/">Nepal vs Uganda: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Unit: hectares
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 186 places, 4,306 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.