Nepal vs Poland: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Nepal
647.14 hectares
in 2024
Poland
652.93 hectares
in 2024
Nepal rank
31st
Poland rank
30th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Nepal
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 652.93 hectares against 647.14 hectares in Nepal, a difference of 5.79 hectares.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Nepal ranks 31st and Poland ranks 30th of 186 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 181.48 hectares | 742.75 hectares | 561.28 hectares | Poland |
| 2010s | 296.05 hectares | 1,036 hectares | 740.28 hectares | Poland |
| 2020s | 619.07 hectares | 912.32 hectares | 293.24 hectares | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Nepal or Poland?
- Poland, at 652.93 hectares against 647.14 hectares in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Nepal and Poland?
- 5.79 hectares, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Poland?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Nepal and Poland rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Nepal ranks 31st and Poland ranks 30th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.