What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Namibia and San Marino?

0.0212 hectares, with San Marino ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and San Marino?

17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Namibia vs San Marino: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled

Namibia

0.1461 hectares

in 2024

San Marino

0.1673 hectares

in 2024

Namibia rank

176th

San Marino rank

175th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time

Namibia
San Marino

How they compare

San Marino currently reports 0.1673 hectares against 0.1461 hectares in Namibia, a difference of 0.0212 hectares.

That makes San Marino's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 176th and San Marino ranks 175th of 186 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and San Marino in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Namibia	San Marino	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.1099 hectares	0.0916 hectares	0.0183 hectares	Namibia
2010s	0.1651 hectares	0.1784 hectares	0.0133 hectares	San Marino
2020s	0.1945 hectares	0.2677 hectares	0.0732 hectares	San Marino

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Namibia or San Marino?: San Marino, at 0.1673 hectares against 0.1461 hectares in Namibia as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Namibia and San Marino?: 0.0212 hectares, with San Marino ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and San Marino?: 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
How do Namibia and San Marino rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?: Namibia ranks 176th and San Marino ranks 175th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs San Marino: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/namibia/san-marino/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/namibia/san-marino/">Namibia vs San Marino: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Unit: hectares
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 186 places, 4,306 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.