Montserrat vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Montserrat
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Montserrat currently reports 0.9586 hectares against 0.6624 hectares in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.2962 hectares.
That makes Montserrat's figure about 1.4 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Montserrat ranks 163rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 164th of 186 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montserrat | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5817 hectares | 6.89 hectares | 6.31 hectares | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 0.2212 hectares | 3.7 hectares | 3.48 hectares | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2020s | 0.5899 hectares | 2.98 hectares | 2.39 hectares | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Montserrat or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Montserrat, at 0.9586 hectares against 0.6624 hectares in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2021.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Montserrat and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.2962 hectares, with Montserrat ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montserrat and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
- How do Montserrat and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Montserrat ranks 163rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 164th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.