Mongolia vs Syria: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Mongolia
0.3195 hectares
in 2019
Syria
0.2535 hectares
in 2024
Mongolia rank
170th
Syria rank
173rd
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Mongolia
- Syria
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.3195 hectares against 0.2535 hectares in Syria, a difference of 0.066 hectares.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.3 times Syria's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Syria ahead.
Mongolia ranks 170th and Syria ranks 173rd of 186 countries.
Syria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Syria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.35 hectares | 4.15 hectares | 1.8 hectares | Syria |
| 2010s | 1.3 hectares | 2.21 hectares | 0.9106 hectares | Syria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Mongolia or Syria?
- Mongolia, at 0.3195 hectares against 0.2535 hectares in Syria as of 2019.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Mongolia and Syria?
- 0.066 hectares, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Syria?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2019.
- How do Mongolia and Syria rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Mongolia ranks 170th and Syria ranks 173rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.