What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Mongolia and Reunion?

0.0316 hectares, with Mongolia ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Reunion?

12 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2012.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Mongolia vs Reunion: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled

Mongolia

0.3195 hectares

in 2019

Reunion

0.2879 hectares

in 2016

Mongolia rank

170th

Reunion rank

172nd

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time

Mongolia
Reunion

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 0.3195 hectares against 0.2879 hectares in Reunion, a difference of 0.0316 hectares.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Reunion's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Reunion ahead.

Mongolia ranks 170th and Reunion ranks 172nd of 186 countries.

Reunion has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Mongolia	Reunion	Difference	Ahead
2000s	2.35 hectares	4.48 hectares	2.13 hectares	Reunion
2010s	1.93 hectares	15.05 hectares	13.12 hectares	Reunion

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Mongolia or Reunion?: Mongolia, at 0.3195 hectares against 0.2879 hectares in Reunion as of 2019.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Mongolia and Reunion?: 0.0316 hectares, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Reunion?: 12 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2012.
How do Mongolia and Reunion rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?: Mongolia ranks 170th and Reunion ranks 172nd of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Reunion: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/mongolia/reunion/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/mongolia/reunion/">Mongolia vs Reunion: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Unit: hectares
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 186 places, 4,306 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.