Malta vs San Marino: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Malta
0.1252 hectares
in 2013
San Marino
0.1673 hectares
in 2024
Malta rank
177th
San Marino rank
175th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Malta
- San Marino
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 0.1673 hectares against 0.1252 hectares in Malta, a difference of 0.0421 hectares.
That makes San Marino's figure about 1.3 times Malta's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 177th and San Marino ranks 175th of 186 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4488 hectares | 0.0976 hectares | 0.3512 hectares | Malta |
| 2010s | 0.1252 hectares | 0.0557 hectares | 0.0695 hectares | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Malta or San Marino?
- San Marino, at 0.1673 hectares against 0.1252 hectares in Malta as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Malta and San Marino?
- 0.0421 hectares, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and San Marino?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2012.
- How do Malta and San Marino rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Malta ranks 177th and San Marino ranks 175th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.