Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Malta or Namibia?

Namibia, at 0.1461 hectares against 0.1252 hectares in Malta as of 2024.

What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Malta and Namibia?

0.0209 hectares, with Namibia ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Namibia?

7 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2013.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malta vs Namibia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled

Malta

0.1252 hectares

in 2013

Namibia

0.1461 hectares

in 2024

Malta rank

177th

Namibia rank

176th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time

Malta
Namibia

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.1461 hectares against 0.1252 hectares in Malta, a difference of 0.0209 hectares.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 177th and Namibia ranks 176th of 186 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malta	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.4592 hectares	0.1001 hectares	0.3591 hectares	Malta
2010s	0.1252 hectares	0.1464 hectares	0.0212 hectares	Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Malta or Namibia?: Namibia, at 0.1461 hectares against 0.1252 hectares in Malta as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Malta and Namibia?: 0.0209 hectares, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Namibia?: 7 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2013.
How do Malta and Namibia rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?: Malta ranks 177th and Namibia ranks 176th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Namibia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/malta/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/malta/namibia/">Malta vs Namibia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Unit: hectares
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 186 places, 4,306 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.