Luxembourg vs Malawi: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Luxembourg
6.53 hectares
in 2024
Malawi
8.49 hectares
in 2024
Luxembourg rank
138th
Malawi rank
136th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Luxembourg
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 8.49 hectares against 6.53 hectares in Luxembourg, a difference of 1.96 hectares.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.3 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Malawi ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 138th and Malawi ranks 136th of 186 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.4 hectares | 27.4 hectares | 20 hectares | Malawi |
| 2010s | 6.73 hectares | 21.2 hectares | 14.46 hectares | Malawi |
| 2020s | 5.84 hectares | 26.2 hectares | 20.36 hectares | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Luxembourg or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 8.49 hectares against 6.53 hectares in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Luxembourg and Malawi?
- 1.96 hectares, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Malawi?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Malawi rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Luxembourg ranks 138th and Malawi ranks 136th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.