Libya vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Libya
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0.9731 hectares against 0.6624 hectares in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.3107 hectares.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.5 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Libya ranks 162nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 164th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4795 hectares | 6.89 hectares | 6.41 hectares | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 0.4112 hectares | 1.9 hectares | 1.49 hectares | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2020s | 1.17 hectares | 0.5152 hectares | 0.6528 hectares | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Libya or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Libya, at 0.9731 hectares against 0.6624 hectares in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Libya and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.3107 hectares, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Libya ranks 162nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 164th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.