Libya vs Liechtenstein: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Libya
0.9731 hectares
in 2024
Liechtenstein
1.11 hectares
in 2024
Libya rank
162nd
Liechtenstein rank
160th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Libya
- Liechtenstein
How they compare
Liechtenstein currently reports 1.11 hectares against 0.9731 hectares in Libya, a difference of 0.1369 hectares.
That makes Liechtenstein's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 162nd and Liechtenstein ranks 160th of 186 countries.
Liechtenstein has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Liechtenstein | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4795 hectares | 2.83 hectares | 2.35 hectares | Liechtenstein |
| 2010s | 0.4112 hectares | 1.43 hectares | 1.02 hectares | Liechtenstein |
| 2020s | 1.17 hectares | 1.18 hectares | 0.0169 hectares | Liechtenstein |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Libya or Liechtenstein?
- Liechtenstein, at 1.11 hectares against 0.9731 hectares in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Libya and Liechtenstein?
- 0.1369 hectares, with Liechtenstein ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Liechtenstein?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Liechtenstein rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Libya ranks 162nd and Liechtenstein ranks 160th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.