Kyrgyzstan vs Liechtenstein: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Kyrgyzstan
1.13 hectares
in 2024
Liechtenstein
1.11 hectares
in 2024
Kyrgyzstan rank
159th
Liechtenstein rank
160th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Liechtenstein
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 1.13 hectares against 1.11 hectares in Liechtenstein, a difference of 0.02 hectares.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Liechtenstein ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 159th and Liechtenstein ranks 160th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Liechtenstein in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Liechtenstein | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.45 hectares | 2.83 hectares | 1.37 hectares | Liechtenstein |
| 2010s | 2.11 hectares | 1.65 hectares | 0.4612 hectares | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 0.7375 hectares | 1.18 hectares | 0.4474 hectares | Liechtenstein |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Kyrgyzstan or Liechtenstein?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 1.13 hectares against 1.11 hectares in Liechtenstein as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Kyrgyzstan and Liechtenstein?
- 0.02 hectares, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Liechtenstein?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Liechtenstein rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 159th and Liechtenstein ranks 160th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.