South Korea vs Sweden: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
South Korea
1,422 hectares
in 2024
Sweden
1,301 hectares
in 2024
South Korea rank
15th
Sweden rank
17th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- South Korea
- Sweden
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 1,422 hectares against 1,301 hectares in Sweden, a difference of 121 hectares.
That makes South Korea's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was South Korea ahead.
South Korea ranks 15th and Sweden ranks 17th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,018 hectares | 1,830 hectares | 187.55 hectares | South Korea |
| 2010s | 2,156 hectares | 2,030 hectares | 126 hectares | South Korea |
| 2020s | 1,486 hectares | 1,771 hectares | 285.19 hectares | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, South Korea or Sweden?
- South Korea, at 1,422 hectares against 1,301 hectares in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between South Korea and Sweden?
- 121 hectares, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Sweden?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do South Korea and Sweden rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- South Korea ranks 15th and Sweden ranks 17th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.