Kenya vs Trinidad and Tobago: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Kenya
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 188.76 hectares against 168.49 hectares in Kenya, a difference of 20.27 hectares.
That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.1 times Kenya's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Kenya ahead.
Kenya ranks 72nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 69th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 2 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 264.34 hectares | 223.67 hectares | 40.67 hectares | Kenya |
| 2010s | 212.15 hectares | 243.01 hectares | 30.86 hectares | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2020s | 156.12 hectares | 147.12 hectares | 9 hectares | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Kenya or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 188.76 hectares against 168.49 hectares in Kenya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Kenya and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 20.27 hectares, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Kenya and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Kenya ranks 72nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 69th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.