Israel vs Moldova: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Israel
4.48 hectares
in 2024
Moldova
4.7 hectares
in 2024
Israel rank
145th
Moldova rank
144th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Israel
- Moldova
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 4.7 hectares against 4.48 hectares in Israel, a difference of 0.22 hectares.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 145th and Moldova ranks 144th of 186 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.66 hectares | 1.98 hectares | 12.68 hectares | Israel |
| 2010s | 13.42 hectares | 2.47 hectares | 10.95 hectares | Israel |
| 2020s | 6.31 hectares | 3.67 hectares | 2.64 hectares | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Israel or Moldova?
- Moldova, at 4.7 hectares against 4.48 hectares in Israel as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Israel and Moldova?
- 0.22 hectares, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Moldova?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Israel and Moldova rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Israel ranks 145th and Moldova ranks 144th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.