Iran vs Uzbekistan: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Iran
0.496 hectares
in 2024
Uzbekistan
0.3493 hectares
in 2024
Iran rank
165th
Uzbekistan rank
168th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Iran
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Iran currently reports 0.496 hectares against 0.3493 hectares in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.1467 hectares.
That makes Iran's figure about 1.4 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Iran ahead.
Iran ranks 165th and Uzbekistan ranks 168th of 186 countries.
Iran has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.69 hectares | 7.61 hectares | 17.08 hectares | Iran |
| 2010s | 12.31 hectares | 1.76 hectares | 10.55 hectares | Iran |
| 2020s | 0.5904 hectares | 0.3139 hectares | 0.2765 hectares | Iran |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Iran or Uzbekistan?
- Iran, at 0.496 hectares against 0.3493 hectares in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Iran and Uzbekistan?
- 0.1467 hectares, with Iran ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran and Uzbekistan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Iran and Uzbekistan rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Iran ranks 165th and Uzbekistan ranks 168th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.