Iran vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Iran
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.6624 hectares against 0.496 hectares in Iran, a difference of 0.1664 hectares.
That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.3 times Iran's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Iran ranks 165th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 164th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Iran averaged higher in 2 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.69 hectares | 6.89 hectares | 17.79 hectares | Iran |
| 2010s | 12.31 hectares | 1.83 hectares | 10.49 hectares | Iran |
| 2020s | 0.5904 hectares | 1.65 hectares | 1.06 hectares | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Iran or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.6624 hectares against 0.496 hectares in Iran as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Iran and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.1664 hectares, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Iran and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Iran ranks 165th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 164th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.