What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Guinea-Bissau and Rwanda?

3.29 hectares, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Rwanda?

24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Guinea-Bissau vs Rwanda: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled

Guinea-Bissau

46.04 hectares

in 2024

Rwanda

42.75 hectares

in 2024

Guinea-Bissau rank

105th

Rwanda rank

108th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time

Guinea-Bissau
Rwanda

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 46.04 hectares against 42.75 hectares in Rwanda, a difference of 3.29 hectares.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Rwanda ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 105th and Rwanda ranks 108th of 186 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Guinea-Bissau	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
2000s	47.29 hectares	39.11 hectares	8.18 hectares	Guinea-Bissau
2010s	60.07 hectares	46.06 hectares	14.01 hectares	Guinea-Bissau
2020s	53.19 hectares	36 hectares	17.19 hectares	Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Guinea-Bissau or Rwanda?: Guinea-Bissau, at 46.04 hectares against 42.75 hectares in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Guinea-Bissau and Rwanda?: 3.29 hectares, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Rwanda?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Rwanda rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?: Guinea-Bissau ranks 105th and Rwanda ranks 108th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Rwanda: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/guinea-bissau/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/guinea-bissau/rwanda/">Guinea-Bissau vs Rwanda: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Unit: hectares
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 186 places, 4,306 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.